EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008 of Internal Medicine Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant, Community-Associated, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clone USA300 in Men Who Have Sex with Men Binh An Diep, PhD; Henry F. Chambers, MD; Christopher J. Graber, MD, MPH; John D. Szumowski, MD, MPH; Loren G. Miller, MD, MPH; Linda L. Han, MD; Jason H. Chen, BA; Felice Lin, BA; Jessica Lin, BA; Tiffany HaiVan Phan, BA; Heather A. Carleton, MPH; Linda K. McDougal, MS; Fred C. Tenover, PhD; Daniel E. Cohen, MD; Kenneth H. Mayer, MD; George F. Sensabaugh, DCrim; and Franc¸oise Perdreau-Remington, PhD Background: Infection with multidrug-resistant, community-associ-
contiguous ZIP codes with a higher proportion of male same-sex
ated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been
couples. Male–male sex was a risk factor for multidrug-resistant
USA300 infection (relative risk, 13.2 [CI, 1.7 to 101.6]; P Ͻ 0.001)independent of past MRSA infection (relative risk, 2.1 [CI, 1.2 to
Objective: To determine the incidence of a multidrug-resistant
3.7]; P ϭ 0.007) or clindamycin use (relative risk, 2.1 [1.2 to 3.6];
MRSA clone (USA300) in San Francisco, and to determine risk
P ϭ 0.007). The risk seemed to be independent of HIV infection. In
San Francisco, multidrug-resistant USA300 manifested most often
Design: Population-based survey and cross-sectional study using
as infection of the buttocks, genitals, or perineum. In Boston, the
infection was recovered exclusively from men who have sex withmen. Setting: 9 hospitals in San Francisco (population-based survey) and 2 outpatient clinics in San Francisco and Boston (cross-sectional Limitations: The study was retrospective, and sexual risk behavior Patients: Persons with culture-proven MRSA infections in 2004 to Conclusion: Infection with multidrug-resistant USA300 MRSA is
common among men who have sex with men, and multidrug-resistant MRSA infection might be sexually transmitted in this pop-
Measurements: Annual incidence, spatial clustering, and risk fac-
ulation. Further research is needed to determine whether existing
tors for multidrug-resistant USA300 infection. Pulsed-field gel elec-
efforts to control epidemics of other sexually transmitted infections
trophoresis, polymerase chain reaction assays, and DNA sequencing
can control spread of community-associated, multidrug-resistant
were used to characterize MRSA isolates. Results: The overall incidence of multidrug-resistant USA300 infec- tion in San Francisco was 26 cases per 100 000 persons (95% CI, Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:249-257. www.annals.org
16 to 36 cases per 100 000 persons); the incidence was higher in 8
For author affiliations, see end of text. Infections caused by community-associated, methicillin- Diep and colleagues (28) described a multidrug-resistant
resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have become a
USA300 isolate that had accumulated multiple resistance
major public health threat. A single clone of community-
genes, rendering it resistant to -lactams, fluoroquinolo-
associated MRSA, USA300, was not seen before 2000 but
nes, tetracycline, macrolide, clindamycin, and mupirocin.
is now widely disseminated in 38 U.S. states, Canada, and
Two of the resistance genes from this isolate, ermC and
9 European Union countries (1–17). It can cause unusually
mupA—which determine constitutive resistance to macro-
severe human diseases, including necrotizing fasciitis, sep-
lides, clindamycin, and mupirocin—are carried on a large
sis, endocarditis, and pneumonia (18 –23). Infections oc-
conjugative plasmid called pUSA03 (28). Researchers have
cur predominantly among healthy, community-dwellingpersons who lack traditional risk factors for MRSA (9, 18,24 –26).
Whereas hospital-associated MRSA strains are resistant
to multiple antimicrobial classes, USA300 and other com-
Editors’ Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250
munity-associated MRSA strains are typically resistant to
Summary for Patients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
-lactams and 1 or 2 other drug classes. Older generic
Editorial comment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
antimicrobials, such as clindamycin, tetracycline, or tri-methoprim–sulfamethoxazole, are recommended for treat-
Web-Only
ing less serious community-associated MRSA infections,
such as uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections (3,
27). However, increased use of these antimicrobials could
drive the emergence of new subclones of community-
associated MRSA that are multidrug resistant. Recently,
2008 American College of Physicians 249
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008
Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant MRSA Clone USA300
pital beds; the medical center that did not participate in
the survey operates 59 licensed hospital beds. The partici-
Researchers have recently identified USA300, a clone of
pating medical centers initiated routine specimen collec-
community-acquired, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
tion between February and September 2004 and collected
aureus (MRSA) that is resistant to multiple antibiotics.
clinical MRSA specimens from unique patients (n ϭ 3929)for 12 consecutive months. If a specimen was submitted
Contribution
from a patient for whom a sample was cultured earlier in
The authors demonstrate that the incidence of multidrug-
the study period, we used the first specimen. We excluded
resistant USA300 MRSA is highest in the areas of San
103 isolates because they came from patient nares and did
Francisco where more male same-sex couples reside. The
not represent active infection. Of the remaining 3826
infection frequently manifests as an abscess or cellulitis in
MRSA specimens, 2495 were from patients residing in San
the buttocks, genitals, or perineum, and male–male sex
Francisco. The 3826 MRSA specimens were stratified by
the medical center of origin and then by the month of
specimen collection, and we used a random-number gen-
Data were passively reported or retrospectively collected
erator to select up to 8 MRSA specimens from each stra-
tum. The stratified random sample comprised 801 nondu-plicated MRSA specimens, and of these, 532 were
Implication
recovered from patients residing in San Francisco. We cal-
Multidrug-resistant USA300 MRSA infection is especially
culated the incidence of multidrug-resistant USA300 infec-
common among men who have sex with men. It might be
tion in each city ZIP code on the basis of the 532 cases,
sexually transmitted in this population.
and we used 2000 U.S. Census data (33) to test the asso-ciation between disease incidence estimates and the pro-
portion of male same-sex couples living in those ZIP codes. HIV Clinic–Based Study
identified clusters of infections due to multidrug-resistant
We conducted a retrospective chart review of consec-
USA300 in San Francisco and Boston (29, 30), which
utive patients (n ϭ 183) who had MRSA cultured from an
could complicate disease management and contribute to
infection site from January 2004 through June 2006 at the
development of persistent or recurrent community-associ-
San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) Positive Health
Program, an outpatient HIV clinic that provides special-
We report the incidence of multidrug-resistant
ized HIV and AIDS care in San Francisco, California. Of
USA300 in San Francisco and Boston among men who
the 183 specimens, 83 were collected between 1 February
have sex with men, and we describe factors associated with
2004 and 31 January 2005 as part of the population-based
its spread in this high-risk population, on the basis of 4
survey; these 83 specimens represented a subset of 1014
studies: a population-based survey to estimate the inci-
unique MRSA isolates identified from all SFGH sites in
dence and spatial clustering of multidrug-resistant USA300
the population survey. Using a standardized instrument,
in San Francisco; 2 clinic-based, cross-sectional studies to
we abstracted information about patients’ demographic
identify risk factors for multidrug-resistant USA300 infec-
characteristics, male homosexual behavior, HIV viral load,
tion; and a post hoc analysis of multidrug-resistant
CD4ϩ cell count, past culture-proven MRSA infection,
USA300 isolates previously collected from emergency de-
past clinical presentation, and site of infection from med-
ical records. We collected information about male homo-sexual behavior from the patient’s clinic intake form (typ-
ically administered by a social worker), in which the
Population-Based Survey
patient was asked for self-identification of sexual behavior.
We characterized MRSA isolates previously collected
If the clinic intake form was incomplete or missing, we
in a population-based survey of MRSA infections at 9 of
classified a male patient as a man who has sex with men if
the 10 medical centers serving San Francisco in 2004 to
an anal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear was performed at any
2005 (Liu C, Graber CJ, Karr M, Diep BA, Basuino L,
time during his history at the clinic in the absence of in-
Schwartz BS, et al. A population-based study of the inci-
dications other than anal receptive intercourse (screening
dence and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant-
anal Pap smear). Eight patients had missing sexual behav-
Staphylococcus aureus disease in San Francisco, 2004-5. In
ior data and no history of anal Pap smears; we classified
preparation). The medical centers used passive surveillance
them as men who do not have sex with men. Seven of these
for MRSA; physicians submitted cultures to laboratories
men had non–multidrug-resistant USA300 infection, and
for identification of pathogens when patients presented
1 had a non-USA300 infection. Our estimates of risk for
with a disease that, in the physician’s opinion, required
multidrug-resistant USA300 with male–male sex did not
culture. The 9 medical centers operate 4368 licensed hos-
change meaningfully when these 7 patients with non–mul-
250 19 February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 148 • Number 4 www.annals.org
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008
Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant MRSA Clone USA300 Article
tidrug-resistant USA300 infection were reclassified as oc-curring in men who have sex with men or when they were
Figure. Annual incidence of multidrug-resistant USA300 and percentage of male same-sex couples, by San Francisco ZIP
excluded from analyses (data not shown).
We also compared the proportion of patients with
multidrug-resistant USA300 infection in the HIV clinicwith a subset of 91 MRSA cases randomly selected fromthe 1014 MRSA isolates identified from SFGH in the pop-ulation-based study. Community Health Clinic–Based Study
We conducted retrospective chart reviews of 130 con-
secutive patients with MRSA infection treated at FenwayCommunity Health, Boston, Massachusetts, from April2004 through March 2006. Fenway Community Health isa community-based organization that provides primarycare to more than 10 000 patients annually (34). Reportshave noted that a large proportion of MRSA isolates recov-ered from skin and soft tissue infection sites of patientsseen at Fenway Community Health were resistant to mul-tiple antimicrobial agents (30, 31). Using the same stan-dardized instrument developed for the SFGH HIV clinicstudy, we abstracted clinical data from medical records of
each patient at Fenway Community Health.
Among these patients, 3 with missing data on sexual
behavior and no history of screening anal Pap smears were
classified as men who do not have sex with men; these 3patients had non–multidrug-resistant USA300 infections. We genotyped the multidrug-resistant USA300 isolate of 1
The legend indicates the annual incidence of multidrug-resistant
clinic patient who reported male–male sex and frequent
USA300 per 100 000 persons. The number within each ZIP code is thepercentage of male same-sex couples, calculated by dividing the number
travel to and from the Castro District in San Francisco to
of male same-sex, unmarried-partner households by the number of cou-
see whether frequent travel by men who have sex with men
pled (married and unmarried) households for each ZIP code, based on
between the East and West coasts facilitates the clonal
2000 U.S. Census (Summary File 3) data (33). The asterisk indicates thelocation of the San Francisco General Hospital HIV clinic.
spread of multidrug-resistant USA300. Emergency Department–Based Study
method in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Stan-
Because the spread of multidrug-resistant USA300 is a
potential public health threat, we investigated the distribu-
Molecular Analysis
tion of multidrug-resistant USA300 in the general popula-
We genotyped isolates by using pulsed-field gel elec-
tion of patients with community-associated MRSA infec-
trophoresis after SmaI-macrorestriction digest of chromo-
tions. To this end, we conducted a post hoc analysis of 212
somal DNA (36), spa typing of the polymorphic repeat
USA300 isolates collected by Moran and colleagues (1) in
regions of protein A (37), and multilocus sequence typing
August 2004 from emergency departments in 11 U.S. cit-
of fragments of 7 housekeeping genes (38). We further
defined USA300 by the presence of Panton–Valentine leu-
The study was approved by the University of Califor-
kocidin genes (lukF-PV and lukS-PV) and the arginine cat-
nia, San Francisco, Committee on Human Research and
abolic mobile element by using polymerase chain reaction
the institutional review board of Fenway Community
assays (28). We defined multidrug-resistant USA300 by
Health; the institutions waived the informed consent pro-
its carriage of the multiresistance conjugative plasmid
cess because the study involved retrospective chart reviews.
pUSA03, which was assessed by using polymerase chain
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
reaction assays and whole plasmid DNA sequencing, as
We tested isolates for susceptibility to oxacillin, cipro-
described in the Appendix (available at www.annals.org).
floxacin, erythromycin, tetracycline, clindamycin, tri-
Statistical Analysis
methoprim–sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin, vancomycin,
We analyzed the population-based survey data by
linezolid, and mupirocin and interpreted the results in ac-
weighting each of the 532 cases originating from patients
cordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Insti-
residing San Francisco by the inverse of the probability of
tute guidelines (35). We performed inducible clindamycin
being included in the sample, so that the results reflect
resistance (D-zone test) by using the agar disk diffusion
estimates for the entire population of San Francisco (39). www.annals.org
19 February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 148 • Number 4 251
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008
Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant MRSA Clone USA300
On the basis of each patient’s ZIP code of residence, we
estimated the number of new cases for each San Francisco
Population-Based Survey
ZIP code by using the Stata subroutine svytab, which ac-
On the basis of a stratified random sample of 532
counted for the stratified random sampling design (Stata,
(21%) of 2495 San Francisco residents who had a culture-
version 9, College Station, Texas). By using ZIP code–
proven MRSA infection that was treated at 9 of 10 medical
derived population estimates from the 2000 U.S. Census
centers serving San Francisco, we estimated the annual in-
(Summary File 3 [33]), we calculated the annual incidence
cidence of USA300 infection in San Francisco to be 275
rates for San Francisco as a whole and for each of its 26
cases per 100 000 persons (CI, 256 to 295 cases per
ZIP codes. We used Epimap (version 3.2.2, Centers for
100 000 persons). The annual incidence of multidrug-
Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia) to dis-
resistant USA300 infection containing multiresistance con-
play the distribution of the ZIP code–specific incidence
jugative plasmid pUSA03 was 26 cases per 100 000 per-
rates, with boundary files obtained from the Family Health
sons (CI, 16 to 36 cases per 100 000 persons). Eight
Outcomes Project (40). In the 2 cross-sectional studies, we
contiguous San Francisco ZIP codes had an average inci-
used 2-sided chi-square or Fisher exact tests to evaluate
dence of multidrug-resistant USA300 of 59 cases per100 000 persons (CI, 36 to 82 cases per 100 000 persons)
associations between multidrug-resistant USA300 infec-
(Figure), compared with 4 cases per 100 000 persons (CI, F1
tions and demographic or clinical characteristics, and we
0 to 8 cases per 100 000 persons) for the other 18 ZIP
used the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel procedure to calculate
codes (relative risk, 16.1 [CI, 9.8 to 26.5]). According to
unadjusted and adjusted relative risks for multidrug-resis-
2000 U.S. Census data (33), 10.3% (4896 of 47 664) of
tant USA300 infection with associated 95% CIs (Stata,
couples in the 8 ZIP codes with high incidence of multi-
drug-resistant USA300 were male same-sex couples, com-pared with 2.2% (1771 of 81 141) in the other 18 ZIP
Role of the Funding Sources
codes (P Ͻ 0.001). The Castro District (ZIP code 94114),
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Univer-
which had the highest percentage (25.7%) of male same-
sity of California, Berkeley and San Francisco; and Pfizer
sex couples of any ZIP code in the United States, had an
funded this study. The funding sources had no role in the
incidence of multidrug-resistant USA300 of 170 cases per
study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpreta-
100 000 persons (CI, 41 to 299 cases per 100 000 persons)
(Figure). Taken together, the data suggest that men who have sex with men may be at increased risk for infection with multidrug-resistant USA300. HIV Clinic–Based Study Table 1. Distribution of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus
The SFGH HIV clinic is located in a ZIP code with
aureus Genotypes and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles at the San Francisco General Hospital HIV Clinic
high prevalence of multidrug-resistant USA300 (Figure). The 183 consecutive patients with MRSA infection treated Resistance, %
at the SFGH HIV clinic were predominantly male (85%),white (54%), and men who have sex with men (69%) and
Multidrug- Non–Multidrug- Non-USA300
had a median age of 40 years (interquartile range, 34 to 47
Resistant Resistant Genotypes‡ USA300†
years). Most (n ϭ 179) had skin and soft tissue infections
that manifested as an abscess (n ϭ 121), cellulitis (n ϭ 17),
folliculitis (n ϭ 18), impetigo (n ϭ 2), ulceration (n ϭ 6),
and wound infection (n ϭ 15). The remaining 4 patients
had non–multidrug-resistant USA300 or non-USA300 in-
fection that manifested as joint infection, acute sinusitis,
bloodstream infection, and pneumonia. Forty-five (25%)
patients had infections involving the buttocks, genitals, or
perineum (buttocks [n ϭ 27], scrotum [n ϭ 6], penis [n ϭ
5], perianal area [n ϭ 3], pubic region [n ϭ 2], rectum
[n ϭ 1], and vulva [n ϭ 1]).
* Based on 30 patients. Multidrug-resistant USA300 contains the multiresistance
Of the 183 MRSA cases, 170 (93%) were USA300
and 13 (7%) were non-USA300. Of the 170 USA300
† Based on 140 patients. ‡ Based on 13 patients. Distribution of other genotypes (identified by using multi-
cases, 30 were multidrug-resistant USA300 (16% of all
locus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis): ST59:USA1000 (n ϭ
MRSA cases) and 140 were non–multidrug-resistant
7); ST8:USA500 (n ϭ 4); ST5:USA100 (n ϭ 2).
§ Of the 183 isolates tested, 30 (100%) multidrug-resistant USA300 isolates, 32
USA300 (76% of all cases) (Table 1). In comparison, mul- T1
(23%) non–multidrug-resistant USA300 isolates, and 3 (23%) non-USA300 iso-
tidrug-resistant USA300 accounted for only 2 of 91 (2%)
lates demonstrated constitutive resistance to clindamycin; 1 non-USA300 isolatedemonstrated an inducible clindamycin-resistant phenotype (ST8:USA500).
MRSA cases randomly selected from the 1014 MRSA iso-
252 19 February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 148 • Number 4 www.annals.org
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008
Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant MRSA Clone USA300 Article
lates identified from throughout SFGH in the population-
Health sample (Table 2). All patients in this sample who
based study (P Ͻ 0.001). Among the 118 men who have
had multidrug-resistant USA300 infection were men who
sex with men, the proportion of USA300 and multidrug-
had sex with men, and none of the more than 3000 men
resistant USA300 infections that involved the buttocks,
seen at this health center annually who did not have male–
genitals, or perineum was 27% (32 persons) and 11% (13
male sex had multidrug-resistant USA300 infection, sug-
gesting the exclusive spread of the multidrug-resistant
In bivariate analyses, having male–male sex increased
USA300 clone among men who have sex with men. Infec-
the risk for multidrug-resistant USA300 infection (relative
tion with HIV seemed to be a risk factor (Table 2). In a
risk, 12.8 [CI, 1.8 to 91.3]) (Table 2). Twenty-nine of the
subgroup analysis involving only the 121 USA300-infected
30 patients with multidrug-resistant USA300 infection had
men who have sex with men, 33 of 56 (59%) who were
a history of having male–male sex, consistent with the high
HIV positive had multidrug-resistant USA300 infection
incidence of multidrug-resistant USA300 observed in San
compared with 27 of 65 (42%) who were HIV negative
Francisco ZIP codes with high percentages of male same-
(relative risk, 1.4 [CI, 1.0 to 2.0]; P ϭ 0.056). We could
sex couples (Figure). The proportion of multidrug-resis-
not calculate the adjusted relative risk for multidrug-resis-
tant USA300 infections that involved the buttocks, geni-
tant USA300 infection for men who have sex with men
tals, or perineum was 30% (13 of 43 persons), whereas the
after controlling for the potential confounding effects of
proportion of multidrug-resistant USA300 infections that
HIV infection because the 5 patients who did not have
involved other sites was 14% (17 of 121 persons) (relative
male–male sex also did not have multidrug-resistant
risk, 2.2 [CI, 1.1 to 4.1]). Other risk factors for infection
USA300 infection. Nonetheless, these data suggest that al-
with multidrug-resistant USA300 were past MRSA infec-
though HIV infection is a risk factor for multidrug-resis-
tion (relative risk, 3.2 [CI, 1.7 to 5.9]) and past use of
tant USA300 infection, having male–male sex is also a risk
clindamycin (relative risk, 2.8 [CI, 1.5 to 5.3]) and tri-
factor independent of HIV infection.
methoprim–sulfamethoxazole (relative risk, 2.2 [CI, 1.1 to
We noted a multidrug-resistant USA300 isolate from
4.2]). In a multivariable analysis simultaneously adjusted
1 patient treated at Fenway Community Health for multi-
for the 3 strongest predictors of developing multidrug-
drug-resistant USA300 infection who reported having
resistant USA300 infection, namely male–male sex, past
male–male sex and a history of frequent travel to and from
MRSA infection, and past use of clindamycin, all 3 risk
the Castro District, the epicenter of multidrug-resistant
factors retained their strong association with multidrug-
USA300 infection in San Francisco (Figure). The isolate
resistant USA300 infection (Table 3).
has the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis subtype USA300-0114, as are the vast majority of multidrug-resistant
Community Health Clinic–Based Study
USA300 isolates in San Francisco (28). The isolate also
Of 130 patients with MRSA infection, 126 (97%)
contained a 37136 – base pair plasmid identical in nucleo-
were infected with USA300 and 4 (3%) were infected with
tide sequence to the multiresistance pUSA03 found in
non-USA300; of the 126 USA300 infections, 60 were
multidrug-resistant USA300 isolates from San Francisco
multidrug-resistant USA300 (46% of all MRSA cases) and
(Appendix, available at www.annals.org) (28), indicating
66 were non–multidrug-resistant USA300 (51% of all
that men who have sex with men and frequently travel
cases). Compared with the 170 patients with USA300 in-
between Boston and San Francisco may facilitate the clonal
fection from the SFGH HIV clinic (Table 2), the 126
spread of multidrug-resistant USA300.
patients with USA300 infection from Fenway Community
Emergency Department–Based Study
Health were more likely to be white (86% vs. 56%; P Ͻ
In our post hoc analysis of 212 USA300 isolates col-
0.001); have male–male sex (96% vs. 69%; P Ͻ 0.001);
lected in August 2004 from emergency departments in 11
and have infections involving the buttocks, genitals, or per-
U.S. cities (1), 8 isolates were constitutively resistant to
ineum (37% vs. 25%; P ϭ 0.026). They were also less
clindamycin. We tested these 8 clindamycin-resistant
likely to have HIV infection (45% vs. 100%; P Ͻ 0.001)
USA300 isolates and found that only 2 carried the multi-
or to have used clindamycin in the preceding 12 months
drug-resistant plasmid pUSA03. One of these isolates was
(1% vs. 20%; P Ͻ 0.001). The 1 Fenway Community
recovered from an 81-year-old woman from New York
Health patient who had used clindamycin in the preceding
City, and 1 was recovered from a 37-year-old man from
12 months had multidrug-resistant USA300 infection.
Los Angeles who was identified as a man who has sex with
Among the 121 men who have sex with men in the Fen-
men (Talan D. Personal communication.). These findings
way Community Health sample, the proportion of those
suggest that multidrug-resistant USA300 is presently rare
with USA300 and multidrug-resistant USA300 infections
that involved the buttocks, genitals, or perineum were 39%(47 patients) and 18% (22 patients), respectively.
As in the SFGH HIV clinic population, having male–
DISCUSSION
male sex was a risk factor for multidrug-resistant USA300
Multidrug-resistant USA300 is the first widely dissem-
infection among patients in the Fenway Community
inated, community-associated, multidrug-resistant MRSA
www.annals.org
19 February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 148 • Number 4 253
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008
Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant MRSA Clone USA300
Table 2. Risk Factors for Multidrug-Resistant USA300 Infections among Outpatients in San Francisco and Boston* Risk Factor San Francisco General Hospital HIV Clinic, San Francisco† Fenway Community Health, Boston‡ MDR USA300/ MDR USA300/ Relative Risk MDR USA300/ MDR USA300/ Relative Risk (95% CI)§ (95% CI)§ Infections Infections Infections Infections in Outpatients in Outpatients in Outpatients in Outpatients with Risk without Risk with Risk without Risk Factor, n/n (%) Factor, n/n (%) Factor, n/n (%) Factor, n/n (%) Site of infection HIV infection CD4؉ lymphocyte count Receipt of HAART in past 12 mo Men who have sex with men Hospitalization in past 12 mo MRSA infection in past 12 mo Antimicrobial use in past 12 mo
* MDR ϭ multidrug-resistant; MRSA ϭ methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; HAART ϭ highly active antiretroviral therapy.
† There were 30 MDR USA300 and 170 USA300 infections in total at this institution. ‡ There were 60 MDR USA300 and 126 USA300 infections in total at this institution. § Relative risks were calculated by using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel procedure for the evaluation of the risk for MDR USA300 infection among patients with risk factorcompared with patients with no risk factor. These calculations excluded 13 non-USA300 infections from the San Francisco General Hospital HIV clinic, and 4 non-USA300infections from Fenway Community Health, to eliminate the potential confounding effects of heterogenous bacterial genetic backgrounds. These calculations did not includemissing data. For patients at the San Francisco General Hospital HIV clinic, 6 (4%) had missing data on antimicrobial use, 6 (4%) had missing data on site of infection, and2 (1%) had missing data on CD4ϩ cell count. For patients at Fenway Community Health, 23 (18%) had missing data on race, 1 (1%) had missing data on CD4ϩ cell count.
clone. Emergence of multidrug-resistant USA300 in the
men in San Francisco and Boston and that having male–
community suggests that the USA300 lineage can over-
male sex seems to be a risk factor for multidrug-resistant
come the presumed fitness cost of multidrug resistance.
USA300 infection independent of HIV infection. Al-
Data from this study suggest that multidrug-resistant
though the use of clindamycin and mupirocin, 2 antimi-
USA300 has spread rapidly among men who have sex with
crobial agents that can select for multidrug-resistant
254 19 February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 148 • Number 4 www.annals.org
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008
Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant MRSA Clone USA300 Article
USA300 over non–multidrug-resistant USA300 strains,
lated from San Francisco patients. Since the beginning of
may have contributed to the spread of multidrug-resistant
the AIDS epidemic, sexual contact by men who have sex
USA300 in men who have sex with men in San Francisco
with men from Boston with partners from New York City,
(Table 1–3), the data also suggest that antimicrobial use is
Los Angeles, and San Francisco has been associated with
not an a priori condition for the spread of multidrug-resis-
the dissemination of infectious pathogens (49). Because
tant USA300 given the infrequent use of clindamycin and
travel history is not frequently documented in patients’
mupirocin among the Fenway Community Health sample.
charts, it is not clear to what extent contacts between men
Spread of the USA300 clone among men who have sex
who have sex with men from Boston and San Francisco
with men is associated with high-risk behaviors, including
could have contributed to the clonal dissemination of multi-
use of methamphetamine and other illicit drugs, sex with
drug-resistant USA300. However, the genotype of multi-
multiple partners, participation in a group sex party, use of
drug-resistant USA300 in the patient from Fenway Com-
the Internet for sexual contacts, skin-abrading sex, and his-
munity Health and the recent marked predominance of
tory of sexually transmitted infections (41– 43). The same
multidrug-resistant USA300 in Boston suggest the multi-
patterns of increased sexual risk behaviors among men who
drug-resistant USA300 epidemic probably started in San
have sex with men—which have resulted from changes in
Francisco and has been disseminated by the frequent cross-
beliefs regarding HIV disease severity with the availability
coastal travel of men who have sex with men. The recent
of potent antiretroviral therapy— have been driving resur-
emergence of multidrug-resistant, community-associated
gent epidemics of early syphilis, rectal gonorrhea, and new
MRSA with similar antimicrobial susceptibility profiles to
HIV infections in San Francisco, Boston, and elsewhere
multidrug-resistant USA300 was recently noted among
(44 – 46). Our findings that 27% (32 of 118) of men who
men who have sex with men in New York City (32) and
have sex with men from the SFGH HIV clinic and 39%
Los Angeles (Miller LG, Diep BA. Unpublished data.),
(47 of 121) of those from Fenway Community Health had
indicating the potential for rapid, nationwide dissemina-
infections involving the buttocks, genitals, or perineum are
tion of multidrug-resistant USA300 among men who have
consistent with sexual transmission of USA300 in this pop-
ulation. Cook and colleagues (47) recently reported MRSA
The high incidence of multidrug-resistant USA300
infections involving the buttocks or genitoperineal area of
among men who have sex with men has major implications
heterosexual partners; these community-associated MRSA
for empirical treatment of skin infections in these patients.
infections can progress to necrotizing fasciitis of the geni-
Several important antimicrobial classes for treatment of
toperineal region (Fournier gangrene) (48). It is not clear
MRSA infections or eradication of colonization, including
whether the behavior potentiating these infections among
clindamycin, tetracycline, and mupirocin, may not be ef-
men who have sex with men is anal sex (that is, dissemi-
fective in this population. Resistance to trimethoprim–
nation of rectal carriage of community-associated MRSA),
sulfamethoxazole and rifampin remains rare among
skin-abrading sexual practices, or increased frequency of
USA300 isolates and was not seen in multidrug-resistant
intimate skin-to-skin contact; prevention messages may
USA300 in our study (Table 1). However, prophylactic
therefore need to suggest caution in each of these practices.
antimicrobial use has selected for the emergence of tri-
The risk for multidrug-resistant USA300 infections in
methoprim–sulfamethoxazole resistance in subclones ge-
the buttocks, genitals, or perineum was 30% (13 of 43)
netically related to the USA300 lineage in patients from
among SFGH HIV clinic patients and 47% (22 of 47)
San Francisco and New York City who were infected with
among Fenway Community Health patients, suggesting a
HIV (50 –52). Prudent use of these antimicrobial agents
similar role of sexual contact in the rapid dissemination of
for suspected MRSA disease in men who have sex with
multidrug-resistant USA300. We also found that a patient
men is advisable to slow the emergence of even more resis-
treated at Fenway Community Health for infection with
tant community-associated MRSA. The pUSA03 plasmid
multidrug-resistant USA300 who had a history of frequent
that determines multidrug resistance in multidrug-resistant
travel to and from the Castro District in San Francisco had
USA300 belongs to a highly promiscuous class of conjuga-
an multidrug-resistant USA300 clone identical to that iso-
tive plasmids that could readily accept transposons encod-
Table 3. Adjusted Relative Risk for Multidrug-Resistant USA300 Infections among Outpatients Treated at the San Francisco General Hospital HIV Clinic* Characteristic Adjusted Relative Risk (95% CI)
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in past 12 mo
*Results shown for the most stable multivariable analysis. Addition to the analysis of variables for past use of mupirocin; past use of trimethoprim-sulfimethoxazole; andinfection involving buttocks, genitals, or perineum led to spurious estimates because of small numbers of events. www.annals.org
19 February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 148 • Number 4 255
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008
Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant MRSA Clone USA300
ing resistance to aminoglycosides, trimethoprim, vancomy-
Current author addresses and author contributions are available at www
cin, and other antimicrobials, potentiating the emergence
of even more resistant community-associated MRSA (28,53).
Our study has limitations. Our incidence estimates for
References
San Francisco come from a passive surveillance system and
1. Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, et al. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emer-
may underestimate the incidence of true infection. We re-
gency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:666-74. [PMID: 16914702]
lied on retrospective chart review for identification of risk
2. Diep BA, Carleton HA, Chang RF, Sensabaugh GF, Perdreau-Remington F.
factors for multidrug-resistant USA300 infection in the 2
Roles of 34 virulence genes in the evolution of hospital- and community-associ-
clinic populations; because data were not collected or doc-
ated strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:1495-503. [PMID: 16652276]
umented systematically, our estimates of risk may be influ-
3. King MD, Humphrey BJ, Wang YF, Kourbatova EV, Ray SM, Blumberg
enced by selection, referral, documentation, or other bi-
HM. Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus au-
ases. Specific sexual behaviors were not assessed or
reus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections.
documented in clinic charts; we therefore cannot comment
Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:309-17. [PMID: 16520471] 4. Hota B, Ellenbogen C, Hayden MK, Aroutcheva A, Rice TW, Weinstein
on the association between multidrug-resistant USA300
RA. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and
infection and specific male–male sexual practices. Finally,
soft tissue infections at a public hospital: do public housing and incarceration
because the number of multidrug-resistant USA300 infec-
amplify transmission? Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1026-33. [PMID: 17533205]
tion within risk factor subgroups was small, some of our
5. Gilbert M, MacDonald J, Gregson D, Siushansian J, Zhang K, Elsayed S, et al. Outbreak in Alberta of community-acquired (USA300) methicillin-resistant
higher estimates of risk are statistically compatible with
Staphylococcus aureus in people with a history of drug use, homelessness or incar-
more modest risk increases (that is, many of the CIs are
ceration. CMAJ. 2006;175:149-54. [PMID: 16804118]
wide and their lower bounds approach 1.0).
6. Larsen A, Stegger M, Goering R, Sorum M, Skov R. Emergence and dissem-
In summary, we show that multidrug-resistant
ination of the methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 clone in Den-mark (2000 –2005). Euro Surveill. 2007;12. [PMID: 17370986]
USA300 has emerged as an important source of disease
7. Ruppitsch W, Stoger A, Schmid D, Fretz R, Indra A, Allerberger F, et al.
among men who have sex with men in 2 geographically
Occurrence of the USA300 community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus clone in
distinct communities. The high proportion of infection
Austria. Euro Surveill. 2007;12:E071025.1. [PMID: 17997911]
involving the buttocks, genitals, and perineum suggests
8. Kearns AM, Ganner M, Hill RLR, East C, McCormick Smith I, Ganner MA, et al. Community-associated MRSA ST8-SCCmecIVa (USA-300): experi-
that community-associated MRSA may be transmitted in
ence in England and Wales. Oral presentation at the 17th European Congress of
the setting of sexual contact among men who have sex with
Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Munich, Germany, 31 March–3
men. The link among USA300, multidrug-resistant
April 2007. Clin Microbiol Infec. 2007;13:S27.
USA300, and unsafe sexual risk behaviors should be eval-
9. Kazakova SV, Hageman JC, Matava M, Srinivasan A, Phelan L, Garfinkel B, et al. A clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among professional
uated further in prospective studies.
football players. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:468-75. [PMID: 15689585] 10. Hidron AI, Kourbatova EV, Halvosa JS, Terrell BJ, McDougal LK,
From the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Har-
Tenover FC, et al. Risk factors for colonization with methicillin-resistant Staph-
bor-University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center, Torrance,
ylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients admitted to an urban hospital: emergence of
and University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California; Beth Israel
community-associated MRSA nasal carriage. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:159-66.
Deaconess Medical Center, Massachusetts Department of Public Health,
and The Fenway Institute of Fenway Community Health, Boston, Mas-
11. Adam H, McGeer A, Simor A. Fatal case of post-influenza, community-
sachussetts; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Geor-
associated MRSA pneumonia in an Ontario teenager with subsequent familialtransmission. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2007;33:45-8. [PMID: 17352053]
gia; and Brown University and Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode
12. Christianson S, Golding GR, Campbell J, Mulvey MR; Canadian Nosoco- mial Infection Surveillance Program. Comparative genomics of Canadian epi- demic lineages of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. Acknowledgment: The authors thank Dr. David A. Talan for providing
13. Tinelli M, Pantosti A, Lusardi C, Vimercati M, Monaco M. First detected case of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and Grant Support: By U.S. Public Health Service grant R01/CCR923381
soft tissue infection in Italy. Euro Surveill. 2007;12:E070412.1. [PMID:17439803]
(Dr. Chambers); a University of California, Berkeley, Faculty Research
14. Wannet WJ, Heck ME, Pluister GN, Spalburg E, van Santen MG, Huijs-
Grant (Dr. Sensabaugh); an unrestricted grant from Pfizer (Dr. Perd-
dans XW, et al. Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive MRSA in 2003: the Dutch
reau-Remington); and a Microbial Pathogenesis and Host Defense Post-
situation. Euro Surveill. 2004;9:28-9. [PMID: 15591693]
doctoral Fellowship (5T32AI060537-02) (Dr. Diep) and an HIV Trans-
15. Huijsdens XW, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Spalburg E, Heck ME, Pluister
lational Research Fellowship (5T32AI060530-02) (Dr. Graber) from the
GN, Eijkelkamp BA, et al. Multiple cases of familial transmission of community-
University of California, San Francisco; and U.S. Public Health Service
acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:
2994-6. [PMID: 16891525] 16. Hanssen AM, Fossum A, Mikalsen J, Halvorsen DS, Bukholm G, Sollid Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed. JU. Dissemination of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in northern Norway: sequence types 8 and 80 predominate. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:2118-24. [PMID: 15872230] Requests for Single Reprints: Binh An Diep, PhD, Department of
17. Tietz A, Frei R, Widmer AF. Transatlantic spread of the USA300 clone of
Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco General
MRSA [Letter]. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:532-3. [PMID: 16079385]
Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Building 30, Room 3300, San Fran-
18. Gonzalez BE, Martinez-Aguilar G, Hulten KG, Hammerman WA,
cisco, CA 94110; e-mail, bdiep@epi-center.ucsf.edu. Coss-Bu J, Avalos-Mishaan A, et al. Severe Staphylococcal sepsis in adolescents 256 19 February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 148 • Number 4 www.annals.org
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008
Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant MRSA Clone USA300 Article
in the era of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pe-
et al. Characterization of a strain of community-associated methicillin-resistant
diatrics. 2005;115:642-8. [PMID: 15741366]
Staphylococcus aureus widely disseminated in the United States. J Clin Microbiol.
19. Seybold U, Kourbatova EV, Johnson JG, Halvosa SJ, Wang YF, King MD, et al. Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus au-
37. Shopsin B, Gomez M, Montgomery SO, Smith DH, Waddington M, reus USA300 genotype as a major cause of health care-associated blood stream
Dodge DE, et al. Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA se-
infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:647-56. [PMID: 16447110]
quencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:
20. Haque NZ, Davis SL, Manierski CL, Vager D, Donabedian SM, Perri MB, et al. Infective endocarditis caused by USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
38. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus aureus(MRSA). Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30:72-7. [PMID: 17428640]
sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sus-
21. Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Rieg G, Mehdi S, Perlroth J, Bayer AS,
ceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1008-15. et al. Necrotizing fasciitis caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Los Angeles. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1445-53. [PMID:
39. Groves R, Fowler F, Couper M, Lepkowski J, Singer E, Tourangeau R.
Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: J Wiley; 2004.
22. Francis JS, Doherty MC, Lopatin U, Johnston CP, Sinha G, Ross T, et al.
40. Family Health Outcomes Project. Accessed at www.ucsf.edu/fhop on 10
Severe community-onset pneumonia in healthy adults caused by methicillin-re-
sistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes. Clin
41. Ly LT, Revuelta MP, Hongo I, Kreiswirth BN, Davis S, Saltzman BR.
Infect Dis. 2005;40:100-7. [PMID: 15614698]
Clonal outbreak of community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus au-
23. Hageman JC, Uyeki TM, Francis JS, Jernigan DB, Wheeler JG, Bridges reus skin abscesses in men who have sex with men in New York City: possible
CB, et al. Severe community-acquired pneumonia due to Staphylococcus aureus,
association with crystal methamphetamine usage [Abstract]. Presented at the an-
2003-04 influenza season. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:894-9. [PMID: 16707043]
nual meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Boston, 30 Septem-
24. Campbell KM, Vaughn AF, Russell KL, Smith B, Jimenez DL, Barrozo
ber–3 October 2004. Boston: Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2004: Ab-
CP, et al. Risk factors for community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococ- cus aureus infections in an outbreak of disease among military trainees in San
42. Lee NE, Taylor MM, Bancroft E, Ruane PJ, Morgan M, McCoy L, et al.
Diego, California, in 2002. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:4050-3. [PMID:
Risk factors for community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
skin infections among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Clin Infect
25. Coronado F, Nicholas JA, Wallace BJ, Kohlerschmidt DJ, Musser K, Schoonmaker-Bopp DJ, et al. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staph-
43. Wener K, Gold HS, Wong M, Venkataraman L, Mayer KH, Cohen DE, ylococcus aureus skin infections in a religious community. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;
et al. High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) col-
onization in an urban outpatient population [Abstract]. Presented at the 44th
26. Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Bayer AS, Diep B, Tan N, Bharadwa
Annual Meeting of Infectious Diseases Society of America, Toronto, Ontario,
K, et al. Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics cannot distinguish communi-
Canada 12–15 October, 2006: Abstract 380. Accessed at www.idsociety.org
ty-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection from methicillin-
/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?idϭ2092 on 17 December 2007.
susceptible S. aureus infection: a prospective investigation. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;
44. Scheer S, Chu PL, Klausner JD, Katz MH, Schwarcz SK. Effect of highly
active antiretroviral therapy on diagnoses of sexually transmitted diseases in peo-
27. Treatment of community-associated MRSA infections. Med Lett Drugs
ple with AIDS. Lancet. 2001;357:432-5. [PMID: 11273063]
45. Klausner JD, Kent CK, Wong W, McCright J, Katz MH. The public health
28. Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, et al.
response to epidemic syphilis, San Francisco, 1999-2004. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;
Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-ac-
quired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2006;367:731-9.
46. Truong HM, Truong HH, Kellogg T, Klausner JD, Katz MH, Dilley J,
[PMID: 16517273] 29. Carleton HA, Perdreau-Remington F. A ten year survey of S. aureus isolates et al. Increases in sexually transmitted infections and sexual risk behaviour with-
causing infections among gay men and people with HIV in San Francisco. Pre-
out a concurrent increase in HIV incidence among men who have sex with men
sented at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemother-
in San Francisco: a suggestion of HIV serosorting? Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82:
apy, San Francisco, California; 27–30 September 2006:C2-1142.
30. Han LL, McDougal LK, Gorwitz RJ, Mayer KH, Patel JB, Sennott JM,
47. Cook HA, Furuya EY, Larson E, Vasquez G, Lowy FD. Heterosexual et al. High frequencies of clindamycin and tetracycline resistance in methicillin-
transmission of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
resistant Staphylococcus aureus pulsed-field type USA300 isolates collected at a
Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:410-3. [PMID: 17205449]
Boston ambulatory health center. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1350-2. [PMID:
48. Kalorin CM, Tobin EH. Community associated methicillin resistant Staph- ylococcus aureus causing Fournier’s gangrene and genital infections. J Urol. 2007;
31. Szumowski JD, Cohen DE, Kanaya F, Mayer KH. Treatment and out-
comes of infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at an ambulatory
49. Mayer KH, Stoddard AM, McCusker J, Ayotte D, Ferriani R, Groopman
clinic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:423-8. [PMID: 17116664]
JE. Human T-lymphotropic virus type III in high-risk, antibody-negative homo-
32. Shastry L, Rahimian J, Lascher S. Community-associated methicillin-resis-
sexual men. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:194-6. [PMID: 3004277]
tant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections in men who have sex with
50. Martin JN, Rose DA, Hadley WK, Perdreau-Remington F, Lam PK, Ger-
men in New York City [Letter]. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:854-7. [PMID:
berding JL. Emergence of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in the AIDS
era. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1809-18. [PMID: 10558935]
33. Simmons T, O’Connell M. Married-Couple and Unmarried-Partner House-
51. Shopsin B, Mathema B, Zhao X, Martinez J, Kornblum J, Kreiswirth BN.
holds: 2000. United States Census 2000. Accessed at www.census.gov/prod
Resistance rather than virulence selects for the clonal spread of methicillin-resis-
/2003pubs/censr-5.pdf on 10 December 2007.
tant Staphylococcus aureus: implications for MRSA transmission. Microb Drug
34. Mayer K, Appelbaum J, Rogers T, Lo W, Bradford J, Boswell S. The
evolution of the Fenway Community Health model. Am J Public Health. 2001;
52. Gordon RJ, Quagliarello B, Cespedes C, Chung M, de Lencastre H, Vava- giakis P, et al. A molecular epidemiological analysis of 2 Staphylococcus aureus
35. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for dilution antimi-
clonal types colonizing and infecting patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;
crobial susceptibility test for bacterial that grow aerobically. Approved standard.
7th ed. Document M7-A7. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards In-
53. Weigel LM, Clewell DB, Gill SR, Clark NC, McDougal LK, Flannagan SE, et al. Genetic analysis of a high-level vancomycin-resistant isolate of Staphy-
36. Tenover FC, McDougal LK, Goering RV, Killgore G, Projan SJ, Patel JB, lococcus aureus. Science. 2003;302:1569-71. [PMID: 14645850]
www.annals.org
19 February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 148 • Number 4 257
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Diep, Chambers, Graber, and Perd-
Obtaining of funding: H.F. Chambers, G.F. Sensabaugh, F. Perdreau-
reau-Remington; Ms. Phan; and Ms. Carleton: University of California,
San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue,
Collection and assembly of data: B.A. Diep, C.J. Graber, J.D. Szu-
Building 30, Room 3300, San Francisco, CA 94110.
mowski, J.H. Chen, F. Lin, J. Lin, T.H. Phan, H.A. Carleton, L.K.
Dr. Szumowski: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Deaconess 311,
330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. Dr. Miller: Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson Street,
APPENDIX
Box 466, Torrance, CA 90509. Dr. Han: State Laboratory Institute, 305 South Street, Jamaica Plain,
We tested for multiresistance conjugative plasmid pUSA03
by using polymerase chain reaction assays designed to detect
Ms. J. Lin, Mr. Chen, Ms. F. Lin, and Dr. Sensabaugh: School of Public
ermC, mupA, and the conjugative gene transfer genes traE and
Health, MC#7360, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. traI (28). These assays used the following oligonucleotides: mu-
Ms. McDougal and Dr. Tenover: Centers for Disease Control and Pre-
pA–F, 5'-CTTAGTTAACTCAGCATCAG-3'; mupA–R, 5'-GG
vention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333.
TTTGATAGCGGCTCTATGC-3'; ermC–F, 5'-GAAATCGG
Dr. Cohen: Fenway Community Health, 7 Haviland Street, Boston, MA
CTCAGGAAAAGG-3'; ermC–R, 5'-GCTATTCACTTTAGG
TTTAGGATG-3'; traE-F, 5'-AACAAATGCGTACTACAGA
Dr. Mayer: Brown University/Miriam Hospital, 164 Summit Avenue,
CC-3'; traE–R, 5'-CCTGCTGTTGCTGTATCC-3'; traI–F, 5'-
ACCGATATGAATAACACCGTC-3';traI–R,5'-AAACCTTCACAAGCAATGGAC-3'. Author Contributions: Conception and design: B.A. Diep, C.J. Graber.
By using whole-plasmid DNA sequencing, we found that
Analysis and interpretation of the data: B.A. Diep, C.J. Graber, J.D.
the pUSA03 plasmid from the Fenway Community Health pa-
Szumowski, L.G. Miller, L.L. Han, F.C. Tenover, D.E. Cohen, K.H.
tient with multidrug-resistant USA300 infection who had a fre-
Mayer, G.F. Sensabaugh, F. Perdreau-Remington, H.F. Chambers. Drafting of the article: B.A. Diep.
quent history of travel to and from the Castro District was iden-
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: B.A.
tical in nucleotide sequence to the multiresistance pUSA03 found
Diep, C.J. Graber, H.F. Chambers, G.F. Sensabaugh, F. Perdreau-Rem-
in multidrug-resistant USA300 isolates from San Francisco (Gen-
ington, J.D. Szumowski, L.G. Miller, L.L. Han, J.H. Chen, F. Lin, J.
Bank Accession no. CP000258) (28). In brief, we prepared plas-
Lin, T.H. Phan, H.A. Carleton, L.K. McDougal, F.C. Tenover, D.E.
mid DNA by using the Qiagen Plasmid Midi Kit (Qiagen, Va-
lencia, California). We sequenced 250 ng of plasmid DNA
Final approval of the article: B.A. Diep, H.F. Chambers, C.J. Graber,
directly with 2.0 pmol of primers by using an Applied Biosystems
J.D. Szumowski, L.G. Miller, L.L. Han, J.H. Chen, F. Lin, J. Lin, T.H.
96-capillary 3730xl DNA Analyzers (DNA Sequencing Facility,
Phan, H.A. Carleton, L.K. McDougal, F.C. Tenover, D.E. Cohen, K.H. Mayer, G.F. Sensabaugh, F. Perdreau-Remington.
University of California, Berkeley, California). Primers (n ϭ 86)
Provision of study materials or patients: H.F. Chambers, F. Perdreau-
were designed to provide complete sequence coverage of the pro-
Remington, L.G. Miller, L.L. Han, D.E. Cohen, K.H. Mayer.
totypical pUSA03 nucleotide sequence (28); these primers are
Statistical expertise: B.A Diep, C.J. Graber, L.G. Miller.
described in detail in the Appendix Table. W-50 19 February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 148 • Number 4 www.annals.org
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 5 P.M. ET, MONDAY, JAN. 14, 2008
Appendix Table. Primers Used in Sequencing of Multiresistance Conjugative Plasmid pUSA03 5 to 3 5 to 3 Coverage of pUSA03 Open Reading Frames*
* As detailed in GenBank Accession no. CP000258 (28). www.annals.org
19 February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 148 • Number 4 W-51
rich4/zai-aim/zai-aim/zai00408/zai2509d08z springj Sϭ10 1/7/08 14:38 Art: M07-1245
The Country School USE FOR GRADES 341 Opening Hill Rd. Madison, CT 06443 5-8 203.421.3113 Ext. 111 Health History Update Academic Year 2010-2011 Student: _____________________________________________DOB: ____________________Grade: ________________________ Pediatrician: ____________________________________________________Phone Number: ________________________________ Medical Diagnosis/Conditions
Whitening Your Smile Smoking & Your Mouth How we look and how we perceive ourselves has much to do with The use of the word “smoking” and the phrase “good oral our self-esteem. When the color of our teeth makes us embarrassed health” in the same sentence just doesn’t go together. to smile, it’s probably time to get our teeth whitened (bleached). As one ages, teeth may dar