JEADV ISSN 1468-3083 Impact of cosmetic care on quality of life in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy and radiotherapy: an initial randomized controlled study G Titeca,*†§ F Poot,†§ D Cassart,‡ B Defays,† D Pirard,†§ M Comas,† P Vereecken,†¶†† V Verschaevec, P Simon,† M Heenen†
† Erasme University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Belgium ‡ Institut de Statistique et de Recherche Opérationnelle and European Centre for Advanced Resaerch in Economics and Statistics, Brussels, Belgium § Notre Dame de Grâce Clinic, Gosselies, Belgium ¶ Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium, †† CHU, Brugmann, Brussels, Belgium
Keywords Abstract
cosmetic care, quality of life, breast cancer
Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and
therefore represents a major problem in public health. Data from patients’ self-
Dermatology, Notre Dame de Grâce Clinic,
report questionnaires provide valuable information about the side-effects that
Gosselies, 212, chaussée de Nivelles, B−6041
patients may view as having a significantly detrimental impact on their quality
Gosselies, Belgium, tel. +32 71 379 654;
of life (QOL) and yet are not always recognized as important by healthcare
professionals. Cosmetology is a specific care for patients and there is actually no
scientific evidence regarding effects on QOL for women with breast cancer. Objective The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of cosmetic care on
QOL in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Methods We developed a prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled
study including 27 patients. All the patients had to fill in a French-validated dermatologic specific quality-of-life questionnaire to compare the QOL of the two groups, the cosmetic group and the control group, at three different times of the adjuvant treatment. Results The results show a statistically significant difference between the cosmetic group and the control group in two areas of QOL: mood state and self- perception of the disease. Conclusion This study emphasizes the interest of cosmetic care in breast cancer patients. However, further larger trials are needed to confirm this study.
and aesthetic point of view, alopecia is probably one of the
Introduction
most difficult side-effects for patients. Moreover, disease
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and
and cancer treatments contribute to modify patients’
therefore represents an important problem in public
perception of their own body, their ‘body image’.
health.1 Most patients with primary breast cancer can be
Data from patients’ self-report questionnaires provide
optimally treated with breast-conserving local treatments.
valuable information about the side-effects that patients
The addition of systemic hormone therapy and chemo-
may view as having a significantly detrimental impact on
therapy reduces the risk of death by 25–50% in patients
their quality of life (QOL) and yet are not always recognized
as important by healthcare professionals.
These treatments are effective but are also sources of
Such information is very important in enabling patients
side-effects; chemotherapy is particularly a source of effects
to make informed choices regarding treatment options.3
on the hair, nails and on the skin. On a psychological
However, there are still surprisingly few published reports
JEADV 2007, 21, 771–776 Journal compilation 2007 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Impact of cosmetic care on QOL in breast cancer patients
from comprehensive QOL studies comparing such
The patients of the cosmetic group received individual coun-
treatments and thus little is known about the relative
selling to choose the wig (model, colour), to do its mainten-
ance and to have refund by insurance company. Moreover,
Cosmetology is a specific care offering not only face
this group received, by the same investigator (dermatologist
moisturizing care, moisturizing massages, corrective
qualified in cosmetic care), a 2-h session including face
make-up, manicure, and pedicure, but also specialized
moisturizing care, body moisturizing massage with oils or
hair counsels (wigs, scarf, headband) to help patients to
moisturizing creams, camouflage, manicure, pedicure and
take care of themselves and to correct the side-effects of
make-up every month. Finally, they had an interview for
anti-cancer treatment such as alopecia, paleness, dryness
conclusion after the last session of radiotherapy (Table 2).
of the skin, scars, erythema, and nail dystrophy.
Data were analysed using the statistics software SPSS
Unfortunately, so far there is no scientific evidence of
12. Significance was assessed using the chi-squared or
the benefit of cosmetology on QOL. The aim of our study
Fisher tests and was set at P < 0.05.
was to assess the impact of cosmetology and hair care on
Likert scale responses were arbitrarily subdivided in
QOL in breast cancer patients during the whole treatment
two groups: never, seldom, not at all, somewhat, I don’t
know, not concerned corresponding to ‘not altered QOL’group, and sometimes, often, always, moderately, verymuch, extremely corresponding to ‘altered QOL’ group. Materials and methods Patients
Between January 2001 and August 2004, 27 female
Patient’s characteristics
patients aged 18 years old and over were included in twocentres (Erasme University hospital and Notre Dame de
In the cosmetic group we find 14 patients age 39 – 60
Grâce Clinic Gosselies). Inclusion criteria were stage II
(mean 51); 2 patients had CMF chemotherapy, 12 had
breast cancer treated by lumpectomy (excision of the
FEC chemotherapy, and all had radiotherapy.
tumour with preservation of the breast) with positive
In the control group we find 13 patients age 40 –79
axillary lymph-node dissection receiving adjuvant chemo-
(mean 57), 1 had CMF chemotherapy, 12 had FEC chemo-
therapy and radiotherapy. Patients were treated either by
therapy, and all had radiotherapy (Table 3).
cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF)
All patients except two developed alopecia, one in each
or fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC)
administrated at intervals of 3 or 4 weeks for 4 months(CMF) to 6 months (FEC). Approval for study was first
Impact of cosmetic care on QOL
obtained from the local ethics committee.
Patients were informed of the target of the study and
Table 4 show the number of patients (cosmetic group and
were randomized in two groups, the cosmetic group and
control group) for each responses group: ‘QOL not altered’
the control group. The cosmetic group received cosmetic
and ‘QOL altered’ at three different moments of the
care during the chemotherapy and the radiotherapy. The
control group did not received cosmetic care.
Three questions showed a difference between the two
groups of patients but only after all the treatment (time 2). Cosmetic patients were less discouraged than patients
receiving any cosmetic care (question no. 17/P = 0.032).
Patients were administered a French validated derma-
Treated patients stayed more self-confident (question no.
tologic specific quality of life questionnaire,8 the VQ-
23/P = 0.032). Cosmetic patients stayed more confident
Dermato, including 28 questions about seven different
on the future (question no. 24/P = 0.04).
fields of QOL: self-perception, daily life activity, mood state,
We can thus notice that the treated patients keep a better
social functioning, leisure/activity, treatment-induced
quality of life in two explored fields, the field of the ‘self-
restriction, and physical discomfort8 (Table 1).
perception of the disease “and the field of” mood state’.
All the patients had to fill in this questionnaire three
times during the adjuvant treatment: before the first
Discussion
chemotherapy (time 0), after the second cycle of chemo-therapy (time 1), and at the end of radiotherapy (time 2).
The quality of life becomes one useful tool in the medical
All the patients had an interview before the first cure of
field, not only to analyse the impact of a disease but also
chemotherapy (approximately 12 days before the first cure). JEADV 2007, 21, 771–776 Journal compilation 2007 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Impact of cosmetic care on QOL in breast cancer patients
Table 1 VQ-Dermato questionnaire
VQ-Dermato in English (indicative translation – not validated in English)
Durant les quatre dernières semaines, votre maladie a-t-elle entraîné des
During the 4 weeks, did your disease affect, restrict or
Q2 – pour vous occuper de votre maison : ménage, cuisine, petits travaux
Q3 – pour faire votre toilette, vous raser, vous maquiller?
Q3 – your personal care (wash, ,shave, apply, make-up)?
Q4 – dans le choix de vos habits; vous n’avez pas pu mettre certains vêtements
Q4 – the chose of your clothes (you could not wear some of your clothes
Q5 – pour vos loisirs: sport, exposition au soleil, musique, bricolage,
Q5 – your recreation time: sport, sun exposure, music, do-it-yourself,
Q6 – pour profiter du soleil, pour vivre dehors au soleil?
Q6 – the way you enjoy the sun, you live in the sun?
Q7 – pour vous concentrer: travail, lecture?
Q7 – your ability to concentrate (in working, reading)?
Durant les quatre dernières semaines, votre maladie vous a-t-elle gêné dans:
During the 4 weeks, did your disease bother you in:
Q9 – dans votre vie sociale: sorties au restaurant, au cinéma, au café, allez
Q9 – your social life: going to the restaurant, bar, hairdresser or
chez le coiffeur ou chez les commerçants … ?
Q10 – vos relations avec vos proches: famille, amis?
Q10 – your relationship with your family and friends?
Q11 – votre vie affective avec votre conjoint(e), votre partenaire?
Q11 – your sentimental life with your spouse or partner?
Q12 – votre activité sexuelle avec votre conjoint(e), votre partenaire?
Q12 – your sexual relationships with your spouse or partner?
Durant les quatre dernières semaines, du fait de votre maladie, vous avez?
Q14 – éprouvé le besoin de cacher votre maladie de peau: par le maquillage,
Q14 – that you had to hide your skin disease?
Q15 – eu les sentiments d’être dévisagé(e), rejeté(e) par les autres?
Q15 – that people were staring at you or rejecting you?
Q20 – eu le sentiment d ‘être différent des autres?
Q21 – eu le sentiment d’être sale, repoussant?
Q22 – eu le sentiment d’être seule, isolé(e)?
Q23 – eu le sentiment d’être diminué(e), de manquer de confiance en vous?
Q23 – you were diminished, you lack self-confidence?
Q24 – manqué de confiance dans l’avenir?
Durant les quatre dernières semaines, jugez-vous que le (ou les) traitement(s)
During the last 4 weeks, was the treatment of your disease?
de votre maladie a (ont) été?Q25 – contraignant(s)?
Durant les quatre dernières semaines, votre maladie a-t-elle entraîné:
During the 4 weeks, did your disease cause:
Q28 – des brûlures, des picotements, des tiraillements ou toute autre forme
Q28 – burning, prickling, or any other type of pain?
«Jamais, rarement, Parfois, Souvent, Toujours» for questions 1–8, 13–24 and
‘Never, seldom, sometimes, often and always’ for questions 1–8, 13–24
«Pas du tout , Un peu, Modérement, Beaucoup, Extrêmement / Enormement»
‘Not at all, somewhat, Moderately, very much, extremely’ for questions
JEADV 2007, 21, 771–776 Journal compilation 2007 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Impact of cosmetic care on QOL in breast cancer patients
Table 2 Programme of the meetings Control group Cosmetic group
12 days after the 1st cure of chemotherapy (1st time): Meeting
12 days before the 1st cure of chemotherapy (1st time): Meeting
Planning explanation + delivery of the list of the advised
First visit: Planning explanation + Proposal of a hair cut very short before the possible
Belgian wig makers + VQ-Dermato to fill in at home
loss of the hair + choice of capillary prosthesis + delivery of VQ-Dermato to fill in at home
12 days after the second cure (2nd time):
12 days after the second cure (2nd time): Meeting
VQ-Dermato to fill in at home. Sent by post mail
Planning for Cosmetic Care and first séance of cosmetic care + VQ-Dermato to fill in at home. Specific cosmetic care programme established for each patient with the dermatologist
After the last radiotherapy (3rd time): Meeting
VQ-Dermato to be fill-in at home. Sent by post mail
Conclusions + VQ-Dermato to fill in at home
Table 3 Patient’s characteristics Number of patients Number of patients Number of patients CMF chemotherapy FEC chemotherapy radiotherapy
To date, in a surprising way, only a few publications deal
for women is probably hair care because of its significant
In order to study the impact of the cosmetic care on the
Moreover, we insist on the fact that this study was entirely
quality of life of the breast cancer patients in the course of
free for patients and that the financial aspect could represent
chemotherapy and radiotherapy, we developed a prospec-
a brake with the cosmetic care for some patients. There-
tive, multicentre, randomized, controlled study including
fore, it seems important to analyse possibility of a financial
27 patients. In spite of little information about all the
support by the health insurances or government. It could
QOL, this study shows significant differences between
also realized by cosmetic company as it is already the case
the two groups of the patients but only at the end of the
in France for the association ‘L’Etincelle’ devoted to the
treatment; indeed at this time, patients who received
quality of life of the women suffering from breast cancer.
cosmetic care remain more self-confident and are more
In our study, all the cosmetic care was provided by
people properly trained in ‘hospital cosmetic care’. Un-
The fact that the difference is only significant at the end
fortunately they are currently very few. To develop this
of the treatment shows that it is interesting to follow the
approach on a large scale, it seems possible to us to set up
patients throughout treatment and not only during one
a nurse training elaborated by people experienced in
session of chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
cosmetology and oncology. Cosmetic care provided by those
Although no study was carried out among breast cancer
specially trained nurses stand be available in gynaecology
patients, we know that self-confidence is altered in these
departments treating breast cancer and in oncology
patients and this might interfere with their compliance to
departments and could be extended to other male and
Therefore, it should be important to focus on patients’
psychological life and to develop all kind of support that
Acknowledgements
can help them to stay hopeful and confident about thefuture as illustrated in our trial. We really think that
This study was supported by a grant provided by Lancôme
cosmetology is helpful and the most important support
JEADV 2007, 21, 771–776 Journal compilation 2007 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 21 , 771–776 Jour Table 4 Statistics – Fisher test Time 0: before treatment Time 1: during treatment Time 2: after treatment
nal compilation 2007 European Academy of Der
QOL not altered QOL altered QOL not altered QOL altered QOL not altered QOL altered Responses group Number of patient Number of patient Number of patient Number of patient Number of patient Number of patient Patient’s group Cosmetic Cosmetic P-value Cosmetic Cosmetic P value cosmetic Cosmetic P value
Impact of cosmetic care on QOL in breast cancer patients
References
an international randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 287 –294.
1 Jensen AB. Psychosocial factors in breast cancer and their
7 Brandberg Y, Michelson H, Nilsson B et al. Quality of life in
possible impact upon prognosis. Cancer treat Rev 1991; 18:
women with breast cancer during the first year after random
assignment to adjuvant treatment with marrow-supported
2 Hortobagyi GN. Treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med
high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa,
1998; 339: 974 –984.
and carboplatin or tailored therapy with fluorouracil,
3 Fallowfield LJ. Evolution of breast cancer treatments:
epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide: Scandinavian Breast
current options and quality-of-life considerations.
Group Study 9401. Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3659 –3664. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2004; 8: S75 –S82.
8 Grob JJ, Auquier P, Martin S, Lancon C, Bonerandi JJ.
4 Del Mastro L, Costantini M, Morasso G et al. Impact of two
Development and validation of a quality of life
different dose-intensity chemotherapy regimens on
measurement for chronic skin disorders in French:
psychological distress in early breast cancer patients.
VQ-Dermato. Dermatol 1999; 199: 213 –222. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 359 –366.
9 DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a
5 Riccardi A, Tinelli C, Brugnatelli S et al. Doubling of the
risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment:
epirubicin dosage within the 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and
meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on
cyclophosphamide regimen: a prospective, randomized,
patient adherence. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:
multicentric study on antitumor effect and quality of life in
advanced breast cancer. Int J Oncol 2000; 16: 769 –767.
10 Somerset W, Stout SC, Miller AH, Musselman D. Breast
6 Bottomley A, Therasse P, Piccart M et al. Health-related
cancer and depression. Oncology (Huntingt) 2004; 18:
quality of life in survivors of locally advanced breast cancer:
JEADV 2007, 21, 771–776 Journal compilation 2007 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Dr. Robert Rowen on Cholesterol DM: Dr. Joseph Mercola RR: Dr. Robert Rowen Introduction: DM: Welcome, HYHU\RQH7KLVLV'U0HUFROD7RGD\,¶PMRLQHGE\'U5REHUW5RZHQ who is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Johns Hopkins University and the University of California, San Francisco. He has been board-certified and recertified in family practice DQGHPHUJHQF\PHGLFLQH+H¶VFXU
The Cell Culture Contamination PreventiveThe Cell Culture Contamination PreventiveZell Shield™ is ready-to-use for protecting cell cultures from a broad range of Zell Shield™ is ready-to-use for protecting cell cultures from a broad range of common contaminants. The extremely powerful combination of innovative common contaminants. The extremely powerful combination of innovative anti